Bread is one of the most common foods in a child’s diet. From toast at breakfast to sandwiches at lunch, grain products are staples in many families.
So when parents hear about glyphosates in bread, it naturally raises concern.
Are glyphosates really found in bread?
Are the levels dangerous?
Should families stop buying certain brands?
As a board-certified pediatric endocrinologist, my goal is to explain the science clearly — without exaggeration and without minimizing valid questions.
Glyphosate is a herbicide commonly used in agriculture. It is applied to crops such as wheat, oats, soybeans, and corn to control weeds.
Wheat, in particular, may be treated before harvest in certain agricultural practices. Because bread is made from wheat flour, trace residues can remain in the final product.
This does not mean bread is unsafe.
It means that when glyphosate is used in crop production, low-level residues can be measurable in grain-based foods.
In early 2026, the Florida Department of Health released results from laboratory testing of several commercially available bread products as part of a statewide food safety initiative.
The testing found detectable glyphosate residues in multiple bread products, while others tested below detectable levels.
The levels reported were measured in parts per billion (ppb),an extremely small unit of concentration.
To put this into perspective:
The EPA allows significantly higher maximum residue limits for glyphosate in wheat crops than the trace amounts reported in retail bread testing.
Detectable does not automatically mean harmful.
It means the laboratory equipment is sensitive enough to measure extremely small quantities.
When interpreting these findings, two facts are important:
Public testing results increase transparency — but understanding risk requires context.
Retail market surveillance studies provide some perspective.
A Canadian study analyzing food products between 2015 and 2017 found that 42.3% of tested foods contained detectable glyphosate residues, with the highest concentrations found in milled grain and pulse products (Kolakowski et al., 2020).
Importantly:
99.4% of samples were within regulatory limits.
That is a critical point.
Detectable does not equal dangerous.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) establishes maximum residue tolerances and a chronic reference dose of 0.1 mg/kg/day.
Most bread products tested in surveillance studies fall well below these limits.
Regulatory agencies currently state that typical dietary intake does not pose a health risk.
However, parents often ask a deeper question:
Even if levels are below safety limits, could long-term exposure affect children’s development?
That question requires nuance.
Studies examining urinary glyphosate levels have found that grain consumption is associated with higher measurable exposure (Soukup et al., 2020; Louie et al., 2021).
This makes sense, since grains are one of the primary exposure sources.
However:
Exposure levels measured in these studies still generally fall below regulatory thresholds.
The concern from a pediatric endocrine perspective is not acute toxicity: it is chronic, cumulative exposure over years of development.
Some studies have shown that individuals who frequently consume organic foods tend to have lower urinary glyphosate levels (Lucia et al., 2023).
However:
Choosing organic bread may reduce exposure, but it is not a complete elimination strategy.
Children’s endocrine systems regulate:
A 2024 study found associations between higher urinary glyphosate levels and lower estradiol and testosterone in female adolescents (Sun et al., 2024).
These findings are associations — not proof of harm.
However, when evaluating environmental exposures in children, we consider:
For a broader discussion of hormone research, read:
Glyphosates and Puberty: Do They Affect Hormones?
And for an overview of overall safety considerations, see:
Are Glyphosates Harmful for Kids?
No.
Bread provides:
Eliminating entire food groups out of fear is rarely the healthiest approach.
Instead, consider balance.
Dietary diversity reduces reliance on any one exposure source.
Glyphosate exposure through bread is one piece of a larger environmental puzzle.
What has stronger evidence for impacting children’s hormone health?
Those factors consistently show stronger associations with hormone disruption than trace pesticide residues within regulatory limits.
That does not mean environmental exposures are irrelevant.
It means context matters.
Here is what current research supports:
There is no evidence that typical bread consumption causes harm in children.
Parents who want to reduce exposure can make thoughtful adjustments, without panic or extreme dietary restrictions.
If you have concerns about growth, puberty, or hormone balance, evaluation with a pediatric endocrinologist can provide clarity and reassurance.
Kolakowski BM et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2020.
Soukup ST et al. Archives of Toxicology. 2020.
Louie F et al. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2021.
Lucia RM et al. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2023.
Sun X et al. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2024.
Dr. Toni Kim is a board-certified pediatric endocrinologist and founder of Life Pediatric Endocrinology. She specializes in growth disorders, puberty evaluation, and integrative hormone care for children and adolescents nationwide.